Gypsy Widow And The European Court

As if that were not enough courts to contradict the Strasbourg now validates the ritual marriage of Maria Luisa Muñoz gypsy. I have nothing against women, who certainly loved your partner much more than others with all kinds of papers. I worry, however, the gradual equalization of the factual situations to the law, which will ultimately render meaningless any contract. Because, why undertake legal obligations if they are to get the same rights without it? Carried to an extreme case, any wedding ceremony would be valid, since the Mormons to the rites of the church of Tom Cruise and John Travolta. Even why enrolled in Catholic marriage court to be the belief that the spouses? By extension, we could save the legal formalization of any contractual relationship, from the sale of property to mortgage loans. Can you imagine the amount of time and money we would save on solicitors, paperwork, and other public records? The challenge, of course, would delimit what relationships are real and which fictitious, where the truth lies and where it lies. For that, precisely, contracts were created.

Maybe the blame for this mess is in the same institution of marriage, which is in its lowest hours. So perhaps it would be deleted. Overall, if it does not matter do not marry, if only last a sigh of relationship and if the rupture often involves unpleasant mess, why go to an institution so problematic?